Skip to main content

China is a big superpower in today’s financial markets. Please discuss this in relation to the European debt and the US-China relationship.

This was written during my Finance102 - Financial Markets course. It was about 2 years ago but I still find it quite an interesting read. The language is poor because it was written under time constraint and some facts might not be fully representative of the situation.


I agree that China is a one of the big superpower in today’s financial markets but definitely not be world’s biggest superpower.

China is the largest creditor (as at Nov2010, China owns about a third of US debt) and with the ability to bail out European countries from debt crisis. With such a fund, China Vice-Premier has recently visited Europe and pledged to pump money into Spanish bonds in order to decrease reliance on U.S as an export market. The European Union has always been the biggest export market for China, hence China‘s investment in European debt came in as no surprise to most people. Also, considering that Europe constitute 27% to world’s GDP and US accounting about 23%, it is only natural that China will soon increase its reserve in terms of Euros in order to diversify its reliance on the US. China currently holds about 35% reserves in US and 10% in Euros, therefore it is normal for China to buy up Euro debt crisis. To add on, Yuan is also a controlled currency and therefore they are diversifying such that they are not relying too much on US.

What is more disturbing to me is what I think is the “actual” reason in China’s move to buy up Euro debt. Many people may say that it is only natural that China will soon step in to help the Euro zone. One thing many people did not notice is that even though Europe is China biggest export market, Europe is also the one of the biggest import market for China. (net export in Euro < US) I suspect the reason behind China’s buying of Euro debt is partially due to its heavy reliance on buying manufacturing machinery from Germany etc. Furthermore, the trade deficit between US and China has been so high because US has always refused to sell key military items and technology to China as it will threaten their national security. Also, we have always known that China has been lacking the “soft” skills, they are the world’s manufacturer but most of their products are researched and developed in the US and other countries. Therefore, I believe that China’s recent investment in Europe holds a more significant reason, which is the hope to buy Europe Zone’s technology and big airplanes (military) that they can offer. When China can stop buying those equipments and make them instead, it will be the real superpower because holding the biggest surplus and reserves does not make them a superpower yet.

In relation to US-China relationship, I would say that their relationship has always rocky since 1991 after the cold war ended. China is on its way to overtake US as the world’s largest financial superpower and US is feeling increasingly threatened. As compared to Japan back in the 1980s, Japan was never considered going to overtake US simply because its population is half of that of the US and in order for them to achieve that, their average GDP per person will have to be twice as much as US in order for them to do so. In contrast, China’s population is more than 4times that of the US. At the current pace, China could well overtake US before the 2027 projection by Goldman Sach. Therefore China is considered extremely threatening to US.
The recent quantitative easing by Ben Bernanke is a move I would say to inflate away the debt to China (there are other reasons as well) and China is not stupid to continue hold foreign reserves denominated in USD (even Japan is buying up euro debt). Therefore the recent buying of Euro debt is one the move by China to diversify its foreign reserves.

Next, the most frequent issues that US have always brought about are that China should revalue their Yuan due their trade deficit.  Due to US having an ACT that can impose trade tariffs on  countries that manipulate their currency, China also does not want that to happen as they are heavily reliance on US. China is still a developing country and their domestic consumption is still not as strong. If China were to have a sharp revaluation like what Japan did in the 1980s (Plaza Accord), I believe that China will suffer a huge load because its current export make up about 23% of its GDP and consumption only make up 38% (low). Therefore, by having a sharp revaluation to the Yuan, it will cause their products to lose competitive advantage and soon most of the manufacturing plants in China will move to cheaper markets like Vietnam. There might be benefit to a revaluation of the Yuan such as increasing domestic consumption when imported goods are cheaper, that’s why China is now slowly letting their currency to increase slowly but definitely not sharply. All in all, China will continue to depend US for export market and US will depend on China to finance their debt.

Another issue that China is facing a problem with US is that they are competing resources around the world. As China continues to rise, it will threaten US in terms of the limited resources that the world can offer. China has been gaining huge support from Africa and this has caused US to be wary of China as no one wants their resources to be taken away from them.  One thing positive for US is that US has been successful in acquiring resources from the Middle East. Therefore, in order for China to continue rise be the world’s superpower, it is also constantly thinking of ways to acquire more resources and such actions are disturbing to our current superpower, the United States (US).

Another significant issue that I would like to bring up about the US-China relationship is history. To me, the Chinese has always been at war. Take for example the recent Korean tensions; China will never want US to have any military near its border to threaten China. The reason why this is so simply dates back to the war time period such as the 8 armies’ invasion of China. If US were to be truly open, they would have sold key military technology to China long before this. Also, there are concrete reasons to believe that US has a military airbase in Japan that contain nuclear warhead that can reach China in 2hours, I said this because the recent showing of military strength by China to have stealth airplane etc is to tell the whole world that China is not to be pushed over.  All in all, the US-China relationship has always been rocky no matter in terms of political issues and economic reasons. US being the current superpower will soon feel that China will be up and coming.

However, another thing that China is currently is facing is aging population. China has long implemented their one-child policy since 1972 after the famine in the 1960s. China will soon face productivity issues as faced by Japan as their population age rapidly.

I would like to conclude that China will become the world’s superpower and the tension between US and China will only get stronger even though they will need each other to attain that. The recent Euro debt issue is only one of the many moves by China to attain the status of being a superpower.

References:





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The similarities between the work of an equities analyst and solving a jigsaw puzzle

Yesterday, I went for an interview at a buy-side investment firm and was required to write an essay about the above topic. It was strange considering they weren't asking me more about the technical knowledge regarding finance. There were also a few other applicants applying to Economic Analyst and Quantitative Analyst roles. I saw their test paper, and it was scary. They were filled with plenty of theories and problem sums, and they seem to be solving long equations. On top of that, they both have a PhD from NTU. I guess the competition must be tough out there to work for a buy-side investment firm (albeit a poor cultured company). I've decided to recap what I wrote during the interview as a way to improve my writings. Here we go: Finding, interpreting and imagining The aim of an equity analyst is to understand the business, analyze the financial health of the business and form an opinion about the future of the company. It sounds simple but is easier said than done. It req...

Thoughts on the article "American Justice - A plea for change"

It is horrified to know by offering the accused a chance with lighter sentences could lead to plenty of innocent parties serving jail time whereas the offering of a million dollar could land you a bribery case. This is double standard, and I would do the same if I was a co-accused for my self-interest. This is also nothing new since we've most likely learnt about it in game theory. I couldn't help but imagine myself in the shoes of innocence behind bars for 20 years. Who did I offend to have such fate laid upon me? Obviously, the government owes me and I ought to be given a large sum of money to compensate for the love lost, the pleasure I could’ve derived (taking note that if pain is a negative feeling and love is a positive feeling, they should return me 2x more pleasure and love) and, the dreams and money I would have made. It is so unfair! So what exactly is the plan (after releasing) for the wrongly accused? A quick search on Google reveals that the country will p...

Sep 16th @ Network Update

Life has been less busy compared to the 1st 6 months of the year. It is still busy nonetheless except that the pace at work has slowed down comparably vs. last year. It is also good that I received my first variable bonus for the first time in 5 years at P&G. It is small though, at roughly about $5k, and am awaiting that coming into my account :)  To recap: May'2020 Net worth = 781,000 Liquid Assets = 335,000 (cash + equities) Home equity = 268,000 CPF Ordinary = 30,000 (myself) + 30,000 (wife) CPF SA Account = 55,000 (myself) + 55,000 (wife) Miles net worth = 450,000 miles = $8,600 SGD Sep'2020 Net worth = 831,000  Liquid Assets = 381,000 (cash + equities) Home equity = 268,000 CPF Ordinary = 30,000 (myself) + 30,000 (wife)  CPF SA Account = 55,000 (myself) + 55,000 (wife)  Miles net worth = 800,000 miles = $12,000 SGD Networth should increase by another 15k by end Sep when i received by bumped up pay but for the time being i am not counting it in. It looks on t...